wal_sender_delay is still required?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Date: 2010-12-06 08:13:10
Message-ID: AANLkTim4cdyXoT5ZvXbhNq0eLP-jQLJh_3R7u9LL6ofY@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Walsender doesn't need the periodic wakeups anymore, thanks to
the latch feature. So wal_sender_delay is basically useless now.
How about dropping wal_sender_delay or increasing the default
value?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-06 10:20:36 Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-12-06 08:01:16 Comment typo in xlog.c