Re: hot_standby = on

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hot_standby = on
Date: 2010-06-08 20:42:29
Message-ID: AANLkTim4V7RtwBp7duo97OwAp0jUKk9lsYFuy0VD60uU@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com> wrote:
> The docs don't seem to contain any discussion I could find on why one might
> not want hot_standby on. Maybe it's just too obvious to most people, but
> this seems to be a bit lacking in the docs.

Well, if you don't want your slave to process queries, then you
wouldn't turn it on, presumably.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-08 20:47:06 Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2010-06-08 20:28:29 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>