Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Date: 2011-01-17 13:55:35
Message-ID: AANLkTim3Va6_5rL55i-qM-UAaEP1P3uZrtsowf=iwxVu@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 14:49, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:43 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Downthread you say that this tool is also useful for making base
>> backups
>> > independent of replication functionality.  Sounds good.  But then
>> the
>> > documentation says that the connection must be with a user that has
>> the
>> > replication permission.  Something is conceptually wrong here: why
>> would
>> > I have to grant replication permission just to take a base backup
>> for
>> > the purpose of making a backup?
>>
>> It uses the replication features for it. You also have to set
>> max_walsenders > 0, which is in the replication section of the
>> postgresql.conf file.
>>
>> The point I wanted to make downthread was that it's useful without
>> having a replication *slave*. But yes, you need the master.
>
> Suggest calling this utility pg_replication_backup
> and the other utility pg_replication_stream
>
> It will be easier to explain the connection with replication.

Hmm. I don't like those names at all :(

But that's just me - and I don't totally hate them. So I'm opening the
floor for other peoples votes :-)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-17 13:58:22 Re: Replication logging
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-17 13:54:50 Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups