From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Make archiver check for SIGHUP more often? |
Date: | 2010-05-11 04:37:53 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim2XXaF9yw_6oReSNoniBg-rvrkmIppTq12SdE_@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> There's a complaint over here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-05/msg00365.php
> about the archiver process not being very swift to adopt a new
> value of archive_command. This is because it only reacts to SIGHUP
> once per outer loop, ie, only after completing an archiving cycle.
> This is unhelpful in the example case, since the point of changing
> the command is to get it to finish archiving faster.
>
> How do people feel about adding
>
> /* Check for config update */
> if (got_SIGHUP)
> {
> got_SIGHUP = false;
> ProcessConfigFile(PGC_SIGHUP);
> }
>
> to the inner loop in pgarch_ArchiverCopyLoop? This would allow
> a new archive_command value to be adopted immediately for the next
> copy attempt. (Hm, I guess we'd need to recheck XLogArchiveCommandSet
> as well...)
Yeah, go for it.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-05-11 04:59:00 | Re: [HACKERS] "SET search_path" clause ignored during function creation |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-05-11 04:21:16 | Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command |