Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Date: 2010-08-05 01:32:35
Message-ID: AANLkTim0HcRiM3VVk48kg4VyJ3chRU_q8rKKJ8MjEfvm@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, the thing about $EDITOR is that it's a very-widely-understood
>> convention.  This one won't be, so the argument for making it an
>> environment variable seems pretty thin.
>
> Fwiw the +linenumber convention has been part of $EDITOR since
> basically as long as vi has existed.

What precisely do you mean by that? We've pretty much established
that the convention is nothing like universally accepted by the
editors that are out there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2010-08-05 01:35:12 Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-05 01:31:51 Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index