Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions
Date: 2011-02-26 14:49:08
Message-ID: AANLkTim00Og3JvwBn-j3ftx1qW0irhioZEeZKV39i5ps@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/2/26 Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>:
> The docs are included in the latest patch, and it turned out that disabling implicit subxacts inside explicit subxacts is not a good idea, so it's been fixed in the last patch. There are no unresolved issues AFAICT.

OK. Peter, are you planning to commit this?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-02-26 14:56:50 Re: REVIEW: PL/Python table functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-26 14:48:34 Re: pl/python do not delete function arguments