From: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL JDBC List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [JDBC] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements |
Date: | 2010-11-25 17:46:30 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim=_21pCC1oidiBbX_h=UiWjM9Zub3FvA34_z0m@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Interesting. I think you're right. Looking at the Wireshark traffic
again, the driver seems to issue a portal-variant Describe when using
unnamed prepared statements, but as soon as the named prepared
statements kick in (per prepare threshold), the Describe is a
statement-variant Describe with the expected behavior you've noted.
Actually, the driver sends Parse / Bind / Describe with the unnamed
statement, but for some reason switches to Parse / Describe / Bind
with named ones.
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-11-25 17:47:21 | Re: Regression Tests (opr) Sanity |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-25 17:34:14 | Re: Regression Tests (opr) Sanity |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2010-11-25 18:20:34 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-25 17:23:03 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements |