From: | fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver |
Date: | 2010-09-22 23:28:30 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim=5BDU101pSKi6YxM7srStV-U_ph8A3qN4RuN2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the tips.
In our case, SIGINT makes more sense. I'll use that.
Regards
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:50 AM, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Yes, I'll be modifying the code. In the walreceiver, I used the following
> to
> > send a shutdown to the postmaster:
> >
> > kill(getppid(), SIGTERM);
>
> You can use the global variable "PostmasterPid" instead of getppid.
> There are three types of shutdown. SIGTERM triggers smart shutdown.
> Smart shutdown is suitable for your case? If not, you might need to
> send SIGINT or SIGQUIT instead.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-09-22 23:47:12 | Re: Git conversion status |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-09-22 23:26:45 | Re: WIP: Triggers on VIEWs |