From: | Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: autovacuum issue after upgrade to 9.0.1 |
Date: | 2011-03-16 23:12:30 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim+mBpfcmSV+FO2LZ2VvGAWJMHxT4qpmebW8mvN@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dear George,
Do you see this issue on 9.0.3, the current and the recommended 9.x version?
Best,
Aleksey
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38 AM, George Woodring
<george(dot)woodring(at)iglass(dot)net> wrote:
> We recently upgraded from 8.3.something to 9.0.1. With 9.0.1, we have a
> huge spike in vacuums every 8 days only on one of our DB servers. We go
> from approx 20 vacuums every 5 minutes to 350 per 5 minutes. This lasts for
> several hours, then stops. I have attached a graph that shows the
> occurrence. I am assuming that it needs to vacuum all of my tables to avoid
> some sort of wrap around counter. I am wondering what is the best way to
> make autovacuum spread this out so it will not be quite a big of a hit. I
> we did not see this with 8.3 and I kept the setting the same after the
> upgrade.
> Here are my autovacuum settings:
> autovacuum = on
> log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0
> autovacuum_max_workers = 5
> autovacuum_naptime = 1min
> autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 100
> autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 100
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.05
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 200000000
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> George Woodring
>
> --
> iGLASS Networks
> www.iglass.net
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nick Rudnick | 2011-03-16 23:45:54 | OT: Oleg Bartunov in Himalaya... |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2011-03-16 22:26:04 | Re: Saving bytes in custom data type |