Re: READ ONLY fixes

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas  wrote:
>
>> Upon further review, I am wondering if it wouldn't be simpler and
>> more logical to allow idempotent changes of these settings at any
>> time, and to restrict only changes that actually change something.
>
> I don't care a lot about that either -- if I remember correctly, we
> got here based largely on my somewhat tentative interpretation of the
> standard.  Even if my reading was right (of which I'm far from sure),
> it would just mean that we have an extension to the standard in
> allowing the benign declarations.  I'm sure not going to lose any
> sleep over that.
>
> I'll do whatever people want in this regard with no reservations.

OK, I've committed this as proposed above.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company