Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-08 19:34:11
Message-ID: AANLkTiljDxL0GY147Jyn-ApY8B3RvxMBDoI1BZi1tUNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I believe that the consensus was mostly in favor of deprecating => as
> an operator name, with the intent to abolish it completely in a future
> release.  Attached is a patch to implement ==> as an alternative
> operator name for hstore, and to make the backend throw a warning when
> => is used as an operator name.
>
> One wart is that => is used not only as a SQL-level operator, but also
> by hstore_in() when interpreting hstore-type literals, and by
> hstore_out() when generating them.  My gut feeling is that we should
> leave this part alone and only muck with the SQL operator, but perhaps
> someone will care to argue the point.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01501.php

hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that
hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
seems off to me.

# is currently used for bitwise xor/geo

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-08 19:35:52 Re: _bt_parent_deletion_safe() isn't safe
Previous Message Jeff Amiel 2010-06-08 19:15:28 Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.