From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Date: | 2010-06-08 19:34:11 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTiljDxL0GY147Jyn-ApY8B3RvxMBDoI1BZi1tUNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I believe that the consensus was mostly in favor of deprecating => as
> an operator name, with the intent to abolish it completely in a future
> release. Attached is a patch to implement ==> as an alternative
> operator name for hstore, and to make the backend throw a warning when
> => is used as an operator name.
>
> One wart is that => is used not only as a SQL-level operator, but also
> by hstore_in() when interpreting hstore-type literals, and by
> hstore_out() when generating them. My gut feeling is that we should
> leave this part alone and only muck with the SQL operator, but perhaps
> someone will care to argue the point.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01501.php
hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that
hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
seems off to me.
# is currently used for bitwise xor/geo
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-08 19:35:52 | Re: _bt_parent_deletion_safe() isn't safe |
Previous Message | Jeff Amiel | 2010-06-08 19:15:28 | Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash. |