| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typo in release note |
| Date: | 2010-06-10 14:29:59 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilW4L-oiZ4r5uiFAB0Q3cZkKzRli49wAyU5xCRi@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The release note says "Allow continuous archive (WAL) files
>>> to be streamed to a standby system" about SR. But no archive
>>> files are streamed in SR. So we should get rid of the word
>>> "archive" from that sentence? Here is the patch.
>
>> I don't think that reads very well. Possibly we could remove
>> "continuous archive" as a whole, but I don't think we can remove one
>> word and keep the other.
>
> I'm inclined to think that "continuous archiving" was meant. At least
> that's the phrase that is used in chapter 24.
Yeah, probably - but I think what Fujii-san is concerned about is
whether streaming replication is a subset of continuous archiving -
the files never actually get "archived".
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-06-10 15:16:37 | Re: Cognitive dissonance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-10 14:16:23 | Re: typo in release note |