| From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Partial indexes instead of partitions |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 11:56:09 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilVoQRBfAuXKm9fuAPph7JFTp-e0eu_qBnTn0t6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 14 June 2010 13:24, Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> wrote:
>> For "inserts" I do not see the reason
>> why
>> it would be better to use index partitioning because AFAIK
>> b-tree
>> would behave exactly the same in both cases.
>
> no, when the index gets very big inserting random values gets
> very slow.
Hm, interesting. Could you please provide some references/links?
--
Sergey Konoplev
Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com /
Linkedin: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp /
JID/GTalk: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com / Skype: gray-hemp / ICQ: 29353802
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank Church | 2010-06-14 12:20:25 | What are the minimal files required to backup a postgresql database |
| Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2010-06-14 11:42:51 | Re: Is there a way to backup Postgres via SQL commands? |