From: | Chris Roffler <croffler(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XML index |
Date: | 2010-05-27 13:47:01 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTilLwLob9MQ2eLrn-Q1wfL9Z2arx1TsThNk3Wkj9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tried that .... same thing
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 27 May 2010 12:22, Chris Roffler <croffler(at)earthlink(dot)net> wrote:
> > I have a table with an xml column, created an index as follows:
> > CREATE INDEX xml_index
> > ON test
> > USING btree
> > (((xpath('//*/ChangedBy/text()'::text,
> external_attributes))[1]::text));
> > And here is my select statement:
> > Select uuid from t
> > where (xpath('//*/ChangedBy/text()', external_attributes))[1]::text =
> > 'User';
> > I then insert 100rows into this table, then do a select with the above
> > statement.
> > Explain shows that the query is using the xml_index.
> > Now I insert 5000 more rows and Explain shows that the query does not use
> > the xml_index anymore.
> > However, if I drop the index and re create it, then Explain tells me that
> > it's using the index again.
> > Any ideas what is going on here ?
> > Thanks
> > Chris
> >
>
> I'd run an ANALYZE after inserting 5000 more rows. The stats will be
> out of date.
>
> Thom
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolas Everett | 2010-05-27 13:48:27 | Re: 110,000,000 rows |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-05-27 11:53:57 | Re: XML index |