From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgeu-general <pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Elections - now open for voting |
Date: | 2010-05-10 08:54:48 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTil0aDkYo7C4IYmCTRA6attl_dXvvAnbYWriMzvu@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, A. Kretschmer
> <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
>> In response to Thom Brown :
>>> Just to clarify, highest ranked vote is 5, lowest is 1. I automatically
>>> selected 1 as my first choice... then bothered to read the actual paragraph at
>>> the top. Luckily I didn't submit it before correcting my selections.
>>
>> LOL. /me too ;-)
>
> You know, we considered putting "5 - highest" and "1 -lowest" in the
> dropdown box itself, but the general idea was that this was
> unnecessarily redundant. Perhaps we were overly naive :-)
Yes, by the sound of it, that needs to be fixed ASAP. Perhaps though,
5 - Favourite, 1 - Least Favouite
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-05-10 08:57:51 | Re: Elections - now open for voting |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-05-10 08:53:22 | Re: Elections - now open for voting |