Re: shared_buffers advice

From: Konrad Garus <konrad(dot)garus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Date: 2010-05-28 07:57:40
Message-ID: AANLkTikzydJP_lGTtPN0nD-O35siBnPbPOtxJSRU0UgV@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2010/5/27 Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Exactly. And the time to browse depend on the number of blocks already
> in core memory.
> I am interested by tests results and benchmarks if you are going to do some :)

I am still thinking whether I want to do it on this prod machine.
Maybe on something less critical first (but still with a good amount
of memory mapped by page buffers).

What system have you tested it on? Has it ever run on a few-gig system? :-)

--
Konrad Garus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2010-05-28 08:12:52 Re: shared_buffers advice
Previous Message 黄永卫 2010-05-28 04:11:31 答复: [PERFORM] About Tom Lane's Xeon CS test case