From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add support for logging the current role |
Date: | 2011-02-17 00:07:29 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikybkb7qduTN5Ys3N_df-7_BcVbTKmtaqGHV8Sz@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 04:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Stephen Frost<sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/15/2011 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Think I suggested that at one point. I'm all for doing that on a major
>>>>> version change like this one, but I think we already had some concerns
>>>>> about that on this thread (Andrew maybe?).
>>>>
>>>> I could live with it for a release if I thought we had a clear path
>>>> ahead, but I think there are some design issues that we need to
>>>> think about before we start providing for header lines and variable
>>>> formats in CSV logs, particularly w.r.t. log rotation etc. So I'm
>>>> slightly nervous about going ahead with this right now.
>>>
>>> I believe the suggestion that Robert and I were talking about above was
>>> to just unilatterally change the CSV log file output format to include
>>> current_role. No header lines, no variable output format, etc.
>>>
>>> I do think we can make header lines and variable output work, if we can
>>> get agreement on what the semantics should be.
>>
>> I think we're back to not having a consensus on a reasonable way to
>> proceed here. Let's take this up again for 9.2.
>>
>
> That's up to you. I can certainly live with what is suggested in Stephen's
> penultimate para above.
OK. If no one objects further, Stephen and I will make that happen.
Otherwise: he's dead, Jim.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2011-02-17 00:14:46 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-02-17 00:07:13 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |