Re: Table partitioning problem

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Samba GUEYE <samba(dot)gueye(at)intesens(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Postgre Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table partitioning problem
Date: 2011-03-11 18:31:44
Message-ID: AANLkTikxt=JTY+dMq769vGOnTYQRmk2O1hJ0YsD5vKLW@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Samba GUEYE <samba(dot)gueye(at)intesens(dot)com> wrote:
> The measure insertion is successful but problems raise up when inserting in
> the simpleMeasure table because it can't find the foreign key inserted the
> measure table and do not look at the partitionned tables

Yes, that's how it works.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fork 2011-03-11 19:06:39 Re: Tuning massive UPDATES and GROUP BY's?
Previous Message hans wulf 2011-03-11 17:54:39 Re: ANTI-JOIN needs table, index scan not possible?