Re: Include WAL in base backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Include WAL in base backup
Date: 2011-01-31 02:47:33
Message-ID: AANLkTikwQp8m_NMkwGQ8xYZx8MHzTPnvMhG1GDxC6Vm=@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> In pg_basebackup.sgml
>>>     <term><option>--checkpoint <replaceable
>>> class="parameter">fast|spread</replaceable></option></term>
>>>
>>> Though this is not the problem of the patch, I found the inconsistency
>>> of the descriptions about options of pg_basebackup. We should
>>> s/--checkpoint/--checkpoint=
>>
>> Agreed, changed.
>
> Thanks for all your efforts! pg_basebackup and this new option are VERY useful.

+1!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-01-31 02:52:46 Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-31 02:47:07 Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"