| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren |
| Date: | 2010-12-17 16:23:45 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTiktsVj1YWMXbA5DTK8wo1z6JAwxp-ynwUmbmobX@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think what we ought to be looking to do is get rid of the distinction,
> so that the postmaster treats walsenders the same as other children.
It's not apparent to me that the existing places where postmaster.c
makes that distinction are in fact correct.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-12-17 16:24:15 | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-12-17 16:21:57 | Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) |