From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: scheduling |
Date: | 2010-08-08 02:41:27 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTiktGa9FcMHzd1pSTAFPEnHWm=z7HKgsfyHEBFnt@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 20:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Do we have a projected data for the next 9.0 wrap, and will it be
> beta5 or rc1? How much should we worry about the remaining open
> items?
If we are taking a vote, I +1 for rc1 :).
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
>
> I am inclined to say that all three of the items currently on the list
> need to be addressed in some way before we move forward... or at least
> the last two.
>
> * ExplainOnePlan handles snapshots differently than ProcessQuery
Isn't this one not specific to 9.0? If so I don't think it should be
a "blocker".
> * Backup procedure is wrong?
This *sounds* like a documentation bug, seems like something we can
fix while in -rc to me.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-08-08 05:19:59 | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-08 02:13:36 | scheduling |