From: | "Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: querying the version of libpq |
Date: | 2010-10-14 12:08:56 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTiks2FL37fwsToZ-qYj4BAiWG_NnOo5NBmHpjUPj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dmitriy,
>
> Again, I suggest PQlibVersion() or PQversion() instead of PQlibpqVersion().
>
> Why this "pq" redundancy in name? Waste of bytes.
>
> the first PQ qualifies the name-space "those are PostgresQl functions".
the library is called libpq, and we are explicitly asking for the version of
libpq; not of any other library that may or may not be connected with libpq
(in some compilations there is linkage to some system libraries, which have
versions of their own. in other implementations there are wrappers around
the libpq-libraray, which have their own version to. Oh, and there is
open-ssl which may be mixed into the whole party)
So 2 bytes of source-code / linker redundancy in times where smartphones
sport 12Gigabyte should be payed....
Harald
--
GHUM GmbH
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971
-
persuadere.
et programmare
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-10-14 12:14:04 | Re: querying the version of libpq |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2010-10-14 12:02:34 | Re: Adding a New Column Specifically In a Table |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-10-14 12:14:04 | Re: querying the version of libpq |
Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-10-14 12:00:41 | Re: querying the version of libpq |