Re: gmpy adapter

From: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Popowich <danielpopowich(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gmpy adapter
Date: 2011-03-01 22:56:58
Message-ID: AANLkTikrscrNzt8=+b8wEHPJ1Da7h7ReCUc7BRKR6OZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Daniel Popowich
<danielpopowich(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Daniele Varrazzo writes:
>> If cdecimal is good for you (i.e. if the decimal semantics is fine),
>> you may use mpf throughout your program instead of mpq. It is an
>> exact type (as exact as decimal of course: you can't represent all
>> the rationals) and likely to be more efficient than mpq. Plus, it
>> maps directly with the postgres decimal on I/O.
>>
>
> Really?  But it's binary floating point.  From the GMP manual,
> http://gmplib.org/manual-4.3.2/Floating_002dpoint-Functions.html:

Uhm... I think you are right. I thought mpf was more similar to a
scaled integer.

-- Daniele

In response to

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Snow 2011-03-02 21:20:34 problem with copy_expert on cursor
Previous Message Daniel Popowich 2011-03-01 17:39:33 Re: gmpy adapter