Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10
Date: 2010-12-14 03:55:13
Message-ID: AANLkTikpiYPMgUvY4XLw=pdcNB1G5JiLUYpmyhYHz4MN@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:47, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> lo_import is superuser-only.  If we design this feature so that it will
> forever have to be superuser-only, to get a behavior that I think we
> don't even *want*, I believe we're making a serious error.

CREATE EXTENSION and pg_read_file() is also superuser-only, no?

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-14 03:58:17 Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-14 03:53:18 Re: rest of works for security providers in v9.1