Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-27 23:52:38
Message-ID: AANLkTikpdOBQGi4tnTE_eM8m+=Zi-XKfTf8xf=MoVepK@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> I would also agree that the minority of our users will want replication.
>> The majority of CMD customers, PGX customers, EDB Customers will want
>> replication but that is by far NOT the majority of our (.Org) users.
>
> That just means that *you don't know* how many .org users plan to
> implement replication, whether it's a minority or majority.

None of us know. What I do know is that I don't want PostgreSQL to be
slower out of the box.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-10-27 23:53:55 Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-27 23:45:04 Re: max_wal_senders must die