Re: A thought about other open source projects

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: David Goodenough <david(dot)goodenough(at)btconnect(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A thought about other open source projects
Date: 2010-06-21 17:10:22
Message-ID: AANLkTikntucB6Kcg9aDpR31pj2gsr0D3af8svLXXLqkX@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> As with phrases like, "the quickest way to grill a unicorn steak,"
> that it can be stated in a few words does not make in possible.

Exactly. The big issue here is that nobody's saying what kind of app
they want to write.

If it's a simple web content management system, the possibility of
having > 1 db being supported is better than if you need a
transactional real time securities trading system, it's a lot less
likely to work on > 1 db.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Davor J. 2010-06-21 17:13:17 Re: Optimizer: ranges and partial indices? Or use partitioning?
Previous Message Geoffrey 2010-06-21 16:56:12 Re: pgpool