From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
Date: | 2010-08-02 06:46:13 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikkFTd7Z8Kt5vdALOK_=t2w1ACaj_6ufsiueVKW@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/2 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/7/31 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On fre, 2010-07-30 at 12:50 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>>>> > * xml_is_well_formed returns true for simple text
>>>> >
>>>> > postgres=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('ssss');
>>>> > xml_is_well_formed
>>>> > --------------------
>>>> > t
>>>> > (1 row)
>>>> >
>>>> > it is probably wrong result - is it ok??
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Yes this is OK, pure text is valid XML content.
>>>
>>> Are you speaking of XML content fragments that SQL/XML defines?
>>>
>>> Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents.
>>
>> I think the point of this function is to determine whether a cast to
>> xml will throw an error. The behavior should probably match exactly
>> whatever test would be applied there.
>
> I agree with this idea - so I am able to do:
>
> postgres=# select 'xxx'::xml;
> xml
> -----
> xxx
> (1 row)
>
> I have not any suggestions now - so I'll change flag to "ready to commit"
sorry - contrib module should be a fixed
patch attached
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel Stehule
>
>>
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
xml2contrib.patch | text/x-patch | 1.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hardik Belani | 2010-08-02 07:20:18 | Postgres as Historian |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-08-02 06:43:40 | Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept |