| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs? |
| Date: | 2011-03-17 18:38:17 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikk4BQWqBHAKi4L_LKNpO245_SYv2QsdyB2QZub@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/3/16 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 22:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> > My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and
>> > collation support are both still pretty broken. Should we just not
>> > worry about that for alpha?
>>
>> FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being
>> noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4. I have mixed
>> feelings
>> about whether an alpha5 right now is useful.
>
> Fair enough. Looks like we will skip next week, too.
Yeah, probably best. I think we're making good progress, though, so I
propose we wrap alpha5 on Monday, March 28. I don't think we'll be
all the way there yet by then, but I think we will have made enough
progress that it makes sense to get another snapshot out the door and
into the hands of testers.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-17 19:39:19 | Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-03-17 18:31:08 | Re: BUG #5842: Memory leak in PL/Python when taking slices of results |