Re: Read Committed Transaction Isolation and SELECT ... UNION ... SELECT

From: Eric Ridge <eebbrr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Read Committed Transaction Isolation and SELECT ... UNION ... SELECT
Date: 2010-08-10 22:58:07
Message-ID: AANLkTikjs9vLDEx81VSNNGt8EJTRAPN4wsKh_Aa-3QB5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> That's just one SELECT command.  Sub-SELECTs inside a query don't
> count as separate commands for this purpose; the use of SELECT in
> that way is just an artifact of the SQL grammar.

Thanks. That's what I figured, but wanted to make sure.

eric

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jay Flattery 2010-08-10 23:29:08 Re: fork() and dynamically loaded c functions....
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2010-08-10 22:56:09 Re: pl/pgsql editor and postgres developemnt tool