| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep v19 |
| Date: | 2011-03-05 17:59:50 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikfk9FfzHas1P0A1rK06gfSmseQbfHmkkzCth7d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Even though postmaster dies, the waiting backend keeps waiting until
>> the timeout expires. Instead, the backends should periodically check
>> whether postmaster is alive, and then they should exit immediately
>> if it's not alive, as well as other process does? If the timeout is
>> disabled, such backends would get stuck infinitely.
>
> Will wake them every 60 seconds
I don't really see why sync rep should be responsible for solving this
problem, which is an issue in many other situations as well, only for
itself. In fact I think I'd prefer that it didn't, and that we wait
for a more general solution that will actually fix this problem for
real.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-05 18:02:50 | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2011-03-05 17:55:41 | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |