From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | David Schnur <dnschnur(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate' |
Date: | 2010-05-12 16:14:16 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikeprGHXOStKzZSyfA82_2CiCAG4shN0LavqPPd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:22:14AM -0400, David Schnur wrote:
>> I develop an app that uses a back-end Postgres database, currently 8.3.9.
>> The database is started when the app starts up, and stopped when it shuts
>> down. Shutdown uses pg_ctl with -m fast, and waits two minutes for the
>> process to complete. If it doesn't, it tries -m immediate, and waits two
>> more minutes before logging an error and giving up.
>>
>> One user, on OSX 10.5.8, has a script that stops the app each morning, to
>> upgrade to the newest build. In his case, both the fast and immediate
>> shutdowns time out, and Postgres continues running for at least 2-4 hours.
>> At that point he brings up the terminal to kill all the back-ends manually,
>> so we haven't seen it finish shutting down on its own yet. It is in fact
>> shutting down, because all queries fail with the 'database system is
>> shutting down' error.
>>
>> The query running during this time is a DELETE that runs as part of the
>> application's daily maintenance. The size of the DELETE varies, and in his
>> case happened to be unusually large one day, which is apparently what
>> triggered the problem. Since the DELETE never gets a chance to finish, the
>> problem recurs every morning.
>>
>> I'll obviously need to deal with that query, but I'm concerned that Postgres
>> is unable to interrupt it. Why might this be happening? Thanks,
>>
>> David
>
> In many cases, I/O requests are not interruptable until they complete
> and DELETE causes a lot of I/O. Check to see if the processes are in
> device-wait, D in top or ps. The solution is to fix the DELETE processing.
> One option would be to batch it in smaller numbers of rows which should
> allow the quit to squeeze in between one of the batches.
Also see if truncate can be used here or not.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-12 16:24:22 | Re: List traffic |
Previous Message | Christophe Dore | 2010-05-12 14:54:29 | Re: [pgsql-admin] Daily digest v1.3217 (11 messages) |