| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Subject: | Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions |
| Date: | 2010-08-23 14:41:31 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikdZ+30dBYPpbbOQ6e9O+YEg-zQKQXkFwGvWzW2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/23 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... The formating
>> enhancing should be shared with RAISE NOTICE command.
>
> I remain of the opinion that RAISE's approach to formatting is
> completely broken and inextensible, and that any attempt to be somehow
> compatible with it is going to lead to an unusably broken design.
> You should leave RAISE alone and just think about printf.
>
ok - then we don't need modify proposed patch. "Format" function is
enough for PL/pgSQL and other PL languages has own mutation of this
functions. There are not barrier for implementation as custom
function, so we can hold this function most simple.
Regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-23 14:46:15 | Re: More vacuum stats |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-23 14:40:46 | Re: More vacuum stats |