From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dba <dbadbb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: performance issue in the fields. |
Date: | 2011-02-14 11:36:50 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikdU4ZqyMO8L2N_BuGiYf2r3wvhE1AN0mJU38A8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello
2011/2/14 dba <dbadbb(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
> create table a( address1 int,address2 int,address3 int)
> create table b(address int[3])
>
> I have created two tables. In the first table i am using many fields to
> store 3 address.
> as well as in b table, i am using array data type to store 3 address. is
> there any issue would face in performance related things.... which one will
> cause the performance issue.
yes, there is. Planner can not to work well with foreign keys stored in array.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/performance-issue-in-the-fields-tp3384307p3384307.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dba | 2011-02-14 12:06:27 | Field wise checking the performance. |
Previous Message | dba | 2011-02-14 11:33:12 | performance issue in the fields. |