| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 11:54:17 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikbvNPfEQMo56itbI6WKAblqbKQJCOsocUpNU6t@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/6/14 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> I attached three patches for the effort.
> Each patch tries to tackle one theme, so it is not unreasonable.
>
> But the ESP security hook patch (quite tiny) depends on the DML permission
> refactoring patch (relatively larger). So, Robert suggested me to reconsider
> the dependency of these patches.
>
> The attached patch shall be applied on the head of the git repository.
> It just adds a security hook on ExecCheckRTPerms() as Robert suggested
> at first.
> Of course, it does not allow to acquire the control on COPY TO/FROM and
> RI_Initial_Check(). It will be refactored in the following patches.
This is essentially the same patch that I wrote and posted several
weeks ago, with changes to the comments and renaming of the
identifiers. Are you trying to represent it as your own work?
With all due respect, I intend to imply my own version. Please make
your other proposed patches apply on top of that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-06-14 11:54:27 | Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-14 11:49:34 | Re: warning message in standby |