Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
Date: 2011-02-18 22:48:21
Message-ID: AANLkTika0ZWQO0aYgdct_N7XarVCvj1eGZZRRH9uGfRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >>> AFAIR nothing's been done about it, so it's a TODO.
>> >
>> >> I was thinking of adding it to the 9.1 open items list, but the wiki's
>> >> been down every time I've tried to go there.
>> >
>> > Since the problem's been there since forever, I don't see that it's an
>> > open item for 9.1. ?That list normally is for "must fix before ship"
>> > items, not development projects.
>>
>> OK.  If you don't feel it warrants being on that list, then the TODO
>> is OK with me.
>
> Agreed.  Do you want me to do it, or will you?

You do it. :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-18 23:33:44 Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-18 22:10:47 Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-18 22:59:38 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-18 22:47:42 disposition of remaining patches