From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore ignores -C when using a restore list -L |
Date: | 2010-06-10 13:24:19 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikZyL1XXsIiMqrvQJDLhNtbpDR31JJYF5ra13zP@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> On 15/05/10 05:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010:
>>
>>
>>> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious
>>> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a
>>> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the
>>> DATABASE item.
>>>
>>> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l
>>> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that
>>> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments?
>>>
>> +1
>>
> Was this discussed change made? Was it backported, or only applied to head?
I believe this is the commit:
It looks like the code was changed, but I don't see any doc updates.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-06-10 13:35:20 | Re: BUG #5488: pg_dump does not quote column names -> pg_restore may fail when upgrading |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-10 13:21:45 | Re: BUG #5488: pg_dump does not quote column names -> pg_restore may fail when upgrading |