From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha |
Date: | 2010-10-25 11:59:22 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikZv_VW+bDkGmPm050zRPAUvN2mWwGXb=zftQco@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>>>> they're supported.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
>>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
>>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
>>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
>>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
>>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
>>
>> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
>> anyway). Oops.
>>
>> I'll look into it.
>>
>
> Thanks :)
Done.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-10-25 14:39:41 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-10-25 11:54:15 | pgAdmin III commit: Allow the user to carry on working with an unsuppor |