From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Date: | 2011-03-09 05:14:01 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikZ1GxpYxz=0__reVPOCozoNkTQ6Vu1qt9xn+9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The fast shutdown handling seems fine, but why not just handle smart
> shutdown the same way?
currently, smart shutdown means no new connections, wait until
existing ones close normally. for consistency, it should behave the
same for sync rep.
+1 for Fujii's proposal
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-03-09 07:38:00 | Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-09 02:59:26 | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade discriptor leaks |