From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SR slaves and .pgpass |
Date: | 2010-06-11 12:34:45 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikYNTlO74r5lgz6p7klKqabF5wnoxma28FMCFOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>>> "localhost" is used.
>>
>> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
>> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.
>
> Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I
> made them better, not worse.
Yep. Thank a lot.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrea Suisani | 2010-06-11 12:35:41 | Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-11 12:32:27 | Re: warning message in standby |