Re: possible error in documentation for 9.1

From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible error in documentation for 9.1
Date: 2011-01-20 03:06:10
Message-ID: AANLkTikWOiwN7V6TS-hTnWAUeNyZLFw2jjt=9m-hMH4G@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Andreas Kretschmer
<akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> wrote:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-class.html
>
> Column relpersistence, type bool, can contain values 'p','u' and 't'.
> whot, a BOOL?

FYI, this got fixed today already:

commit 357faea82e93712937cd109b48ce006789ec7a8f
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: Wed Jan 19 16:09:08 2011 -0500

Show correct datatype for pg_class.relpersistence, plus a typo fix.

Thom Brown

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2011-01-20 03:18:17 Re: get referential values
Previous Message Christian Ullrich 2011-01-19 23:06:24 Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.1 PITR can not copy WAL file