Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-22 19:24:39
Message-ID: AANLkTikW0evN4L_4n3m147ydsZ3R_1Vtk6ABp=7Y7e-8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 19:55, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> 206.223.169.93  anoncvs.postgresql.org
>
> maybe 'cvs.postgresql.org' should be pointed ther too, for the archives?

We've never had any links point to it, and the only people actually
using it were committers. They should know better ;)

Thus, no, I don't think so.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 19:28:02 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-22 18:55:41 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?