From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL FDW update |
Date: | 2011-02-24 14:06:42 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikRC9frRBc9ojAtMq9M5dAE9nKK5UBk8nvo4wn=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:30:05 +0900
> Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:33:25 -0500
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
>> > rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?
>> >
>> > If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.
>>
>> I'm working on it.
>>
>> Fixes for new FDW API have been done, but there are some problems in
>> SQL generation codes, such as SELECT clause optimization (omitting
>> unused column from SELECT clause). It would take a while, but I'll
>> post revised version of the patch tomorrow.
>
> Attached is a revised version of postgresql_fdw patch. I started from
> Heikki's latest patch, and modified some points:
>
> 1) use new FDW API
> 2) use EXTENSION framework
> 3) SELECT clause optimization (use NULL for unused columns)
> 4) show remote query in EXPLAIN output
>
> WHERE clause pushdown was implemented in Heikki's version, so I didn't
> touch around it. Now I'm working on cost estimation and connection
> management, but they would need some more work.
So this is still work-in-progress? When do you expect a final version?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-02-24 14:38:35 | Re: Binary in/out for aclitem |
Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-02-24 14:03:45 | Re: pl/python tracebacks |