From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: validating foreign tables |
Date: | 2011-02-22 05:53:14 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikQkKMknCodCki9C_CxJcg7Wp8i6kWaYB9CteN+@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/2/22 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 02/21/2011 08:59 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>>> I think we need to overhaul validators in 9.2 listening to FDW developers'
>>> opinions anyway.
>
>> Ok, I guess. It just seems to me like it will be harder to extend the
>> API later than now, so if we can reasonably foresee a likely need we
>> should try to provide for it.
>
> Perhaps we should put a large friendly "EXPERIMENTAL, SUBJECT TO CHANGE"
> notice on all the FDW API stuff? Just tell people up front that we're
> not prepared to promise any API stability yet. There's stuff we *know*
> is lacking (it's read-only, the optimization support sucks) in addition
> to whatever we may later realize is misdesigned.
>
> regards, tom lane
+1
regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-02-22 06:59:56 | Re: Snapshot synchronization, again... |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-02-22 05:42:41 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |