Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks

From: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Date: 2011-02-16 23:02:18
Message-ID: AANLkTikQCagn45DQwN8RN+SLKdS90UH7E2bW6++-YwPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > BTW, you use the term 'fictitious' in the comments, would it be
> better
> > to standardize the term used for such an index? So either the comment
> would
> > be changed to call it hypothetical, or the structure member would be
> changed
> > to isfictitious.
>
> Yeah, hypothetical is the more-established term I think.
>

Please find the patch attached.

Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_get_actual_variable_range.patch text/x-patch 1.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-16 23:03:45 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-16 23:00:00 Re: Usability tweaks for extension commands