Re: Wildcard search support for pg_trgm

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wildcard search support for pg_trgm
Date: 2010-12-12 21:53:26
Message-ID: AANLkTikPF5SC9aWHkmG8s3fL7mC5k87rhTMGZdu6c9Xs@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>wrote:

> How different (and better) is it from wildspeed?
>

The general advantage is possibility of usage wildcard search and trigram
similarity search using the same index.
I expect that GIN trigram index is slightly less space demanding, but
slightly slower on search than wildspeed. Also, I expect GiST trigram index
to be slower on search, but faster on updates. While I didn't check these
assumptions in details.
I've lack of test datasets for sufficient testing, and I would like to ask
community to help me with it. Because testing on dictionaries is good,
but obviously
not enough.

----
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-12-12 22:04:11 Re: create tablespace fails silently, or succeeds improperly
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-12-12 21:48:04 Re: Extensions, patch v17