| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY |
| Date: | 2010-11-12 04:53:24 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikOfK67Xm8nd3zfRx0wme52_OLv3RYP54Na_Jh9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If we reuse type IDs of arrays for multisets, the multisets would
> have some special typmod. For example, typmod = 0 means multiset,
> and positive value means array with max cardinality. Note that
> the SQL standard doesn't mention about multi-dimensional arrays.
> So, we can use typmod = -1 as a free-size and free-dimensional
> array for backward compatibility.
I would really like to see us fix our type system so that it doesn't
require this type of awful hack. But maybe that's asking too much of
a patch to implement this feature.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-12 04:57:09 | Re: duplicate connection failure messages |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-12 04:47:30 | Re: Simplifying replication |