| From: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, SAKAMOTO Masahiko <sakamoto(dot)masahiko(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |
| Date: | 2010-09-16 00:53:27 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikMxQRqN6ada=uK3unE9F_9EUtSrfOF2VEh_Boi@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a
>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance.
>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to
>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't
>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes
>> all things possible.
>
> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables...
I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.
--
Hitoshi Harada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-16 00:57:32 | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-16 00:44:25 | Re: Basic JSON support |