| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: List traffic |
| Date: | 2010-05-14 19:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikKmfbnm6vf4YppO0fIKNY8dHUQD3NCckwJQT7x@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-chat pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Second, regarding advocacy: no, absolutely not. -advocacy is a working list
> and not a virtual water cooler.
+1. I would find it very difficult to manage having -advocacy thrown
into -general.
If folks think that information isn't getting wide enough
distribution, that's one thing. But it is an important working group,
even if there's not a ton of traffic all the time on it.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-05-14 19:44:44 | Re: [HACKERS] List traffic |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 19:10:17 | Re: List traffic |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-05-14 19:44:44 | Re: [HACKERS] List traffic |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 19:10:17 | Re: List traffic |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keaton_Adams | 2010-05-14 19:35:54 | Re: Poor query performance on one of two "like" databases in production. |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 19:10:17 | Re: List traffic |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-05-14 19:44:44 | Re: [HACKERS] List traffic |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-14 19:15:24 | Re: Synchronous replication patch built on SR |