From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Little, Douglas" <DOUGLAS(dot)LITTLE(at)orbitz(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Forced quiesce |
Date: | 2010-10-28 13:06:18 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikFnQTMvptoZbsPXOiM_hubxxWvFEix-HXc9nX=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi,
David Fetter has an article about the issue like your. He describes the
situation with DROP DATABASE but it could easily be adapted for VACUUM. Here
is the link
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/dfetter/index.php?/archives/63-Kick-em-out,-and-keep-em-out!.html
On 28 October 2010 16:39, Little, Douglas <DOUGLAS(dot)LITTLE(at)orbitz(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We’re having to vacuum full the system tables everyday due to the number
of temp table drop/creates.
>
> We’re finding that if anyone tries to execute a job during the maintenance
period, it often hangs the db.
>
>
>
> Is there a way that we can force the db to quiesce? Or lock out users.
>
> Luckly, most users are coming in thru a network VIP, so all client IP’s
are the same.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Doug Little
>
>
>
> Sr. Data Warehouse Architect | Enterprise Data Management | Orbitz
Worldwide
>
> 500 W. Madison, Suite 1000 Chicago IL 60661| Office 312.260.2588 | Fax
312.894.5164 | Cell 847-997-5741
>
> Douglas(dot)Little(at)orbitz(dot)com
>
> orbitz.com | ebookers.com | hotelclub.com | cheaptickets.com |
ratestogo.com | asiahotels.com
>
>
--
Sergey Konoplev
Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com /
Linkedin: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp /
JID/GTalk: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com / Skype: gray-hemp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Little, Douglas | 2010-10-28 13:34:36 | advantages of multiple db's |
Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2010-10-28 12:46:47 | Re: Forced quiesce |