Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date: 2010-05-21 15:57:33
Message-ID: AANLkTikEJNlSpTPn6wshxjYCa5-Gj1m3uksjJeXCh6Oy@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> So, here's a working definition:
>
> 1) cannot directly read or write files on the server.
> 2) cannot bind network ports

To make that more covering, don't yu really need something like
"cannot communicate with outside processes"?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-21 16:12:42 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-21 15:55:31 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?